For years, Audacity has been the go-to free audio editor for podcasters and musicians on a budget. But with the arrival of Adobe Podcast, a browser-based, AI-driven platform, the question is clear:
π Which one is better for beginners?
Letβs compare both tools side-by-side in terms of setup, usability, editing power, and final sound quality β especially for creators just starting out.
βοΈ 1. Setup and Accessibility
Audacity:
Youβll need to download and install it on your computer. While itβs lightweight and free, setup can involve extra steps like configuring input devices and sample rates.
Adobe Podcast:
Runs directly in your web browser β no installation required. Just log in with your Adobe account, click βNew Project,β and start recording or editing. Everything is stored in the cloud.
β Winner: Adobe Podcast β Instant access, zero configuration.
π§ 2. Recording Experience
Audacity:
Offers multitrack recording, but itβs technical. You need to understand track management, latency, and monitoring. Great for advanced users, but intimidating for beginners.
Adobe Podcast:
Has a simple Record button with Mic Check β an AI feature that helps you position your microphone, adjust gain, and remove echo before you even begin. You also see a live transcript as you record.
β Winner: Adobe Podcast β Clean, guided experience perfect for newcomers.
βοΈ 3. Editing Workflow
Audacity:
Editing happens on a waveform timeline. You cut, trim, or move clips manually. This gives precision but requires practice and a steady hand.
Adobe Podcast:
Edits are made by changing text. Delete a word in the transcript, and itβs deleted in the audio. Reorder sentences or remove pauses instantly. No technical skills needed.
β Winner: Adobe Podcast β Revolutionary text-based editing powered by AI.
πͺ 4. Audio Enhancement
Audacity:
Includes basic noise reduction, EQ, and compression, but you must know how to use them. Overuse can distort your sound, especially for beginners.
Adobe Podcast:
Uses AI-powered Enhance Speech, which automatically cleans background noise, balances tone, and delivers broadcast-quality voice results in seconds.
β Winner: Adobe Podcast β Automatic studio-quality cleanup with no sliders or plugins.
π‘ 5. Features and Limitations
| Feature | Adobe Podcast | Audacity |
|---|---|---|
| Browser-based | β | β |
| AI Noise Removal | β | βοΈ Manual |
| Text-based Editing | β | β |
| Multitrack Editing | βοΈ Limited | β |
| Free to Use | β (Beta) | β |
| Collaboration | β | β |
| Plugin Support | β | β |
| Integration with Adobe Audition | β | β |
π§ Verdict: Adobe Podcast wins for simplicity and smart automation, while Audacity still leads for deep technical control.
π§ 6. Export and Publishing
Audacity:
You must manually adjust bitrates, export options, and ID3 metadata before publishing β giving control but requiring experience.
Adobe Podcast:
Exports to MP3 or WAV with one click. Projects are automatically cloud-synced and can be exported to Adobe Audition or shared online.
β Winner: Adobe Podcast β Faster and more user-friendly for first-time podcasters.
π 7. Sound Quality for Beginners
Audacityβs results depend heavily on your setup and manual effects. Adobe Podcast, however, makes every voice sound like it was recorded in a treated studio β even from a laptop mic.
β Winner: Adobe Podcast β Consistent sound quality with AI magic.
π Final Verdict
For beginners, Adobe Podcast is the clear winner.
Itβs intuitive, AI-assisted, and fully browser-based β no downloads, no plugins, no learning curve. You can record, edit, and publish in less time than it takes to install Audacity.
That said, Audacity remains valuable for users who want offline editing, multitrack control, or full plugin support.
If youβre just starting your podcast journey, begin with Adobe Podcast β it gets you professional results with zero audio experience.
ποΈ Want to skip the setup and sound pro from your first episode?
Try Adobe Podcast and experience AI-powered clarity right in your browser.
π Start for free on Adobe Podcast